|
Mary Cain, should she go pro or to college? January 15 7930 views |
|
Bad for Track: New IAAF Standards January 2 6895 views |
|
January 4 6063 views |
|
Sidetracked with the new Sweet 16... is it the best? January 10 4026 views |
|
Coaches falling left and right, Clemson Head Coach resigns! January 8 2971 views |
|
Doprah Causes Debate at Flocasts January 18 2761 views |
|
3.2.13 Gbury @ New Englands.Boston B 4x400 April 24 187 views |
|
Coaches falling left and right, Clemson Head Coach resigns! January 8 2971 views |
|
Doprah Causes Debate at Flocasts January 18 2761 views |
|
Mary Cain, should she go pro or to college? January 15 7930 views |
|
Sidetracked with the new Sweet 16... is it the best? January 10 4026 views |
|
January 4 6063 views |
|
Bad for Track: New IAAF Standards January 2 6895 views |
|
3.2.13 Gbury @ New Englands.Boston B 4x400 April 24 187 views |
The video you are looking for has not finished processing.
Please check back in a few minutes.
Get notified with every new Ryan Fenton Video.
Sidetracked with the new Sweet 16... is it the best? 4026 views
After making your selection, copy and paste the embed code above. The code changes based on your selection.
-
320x180
-
400x225
-
480x270
-
560x315
-
Custom
px
px
-
Please login to add this video to your favorites. If you do not have an account, register here. It's free!
Uploaded by Alex Lohr | January 10, 2013
The NCAA has gone to a straight 16 person advancement to the indoor national championships. No autos or provisionals, just straight 16, all based on time and distance. What if there are ties?? We do not know the answer to that as of yet. Regardless, in lieu of the change, one has to wonder... is this the best move or just a good move?
or
to comment.
|
Peter Rice
4 months ago
It was done this way in DIII last year too... The fifth (or so) fastest time from the year before should be the AUTO time. The odds that 16 people run faster than the 5th fastest person from the year before are very low, and would allow for a few people to have the comfort of having qualified, and being able to focus on their training... |
|
Matthew Message
4 months ago
Worked for DIII |
|
Rodger Guigou Shull
4 months ago
Though, as already mentioned, I would like to see more talk about field and sprint events where it's going to be harder to choose a definitive top 16. Lots of ties |
|
Rodger Guigou Shull
4 months ago
I like the name sidetracked. It's good. This is new series is good. |
|
Evan Parry
4 months ago
I'm not going to argue for or against any system, however I am glad that the NCAA is finally sticking to the DI athletes with this qualification change like they stuck it to DIII last year. |
|
Canadian
4 months ago
Ryan is describing the Canadian University system, more or less. There are auto-qualifiers from each of four regions across the country and then the rest of the spots are filled by athletes with the fastest times. For many years the field sizes were limited to 12 although they now do a combination of the two suggestions: Top 12 times/performances plus auto-qualifiers. Typically the auto-qualifiers are in the top 12 but if they are not, the schools can still send them. Ties in the 60m, HJ, PV etc. are also sent, so the fields can be expanded if need be. Twelve as a max was chosen for a couple of reasons. It permitted a number of races to be (safely) run as straight finals, like the 1500m and 3000m, and other events such as long jump to be run as a single flight. This enables the meet to be packaged over a three day period and allows more easily for doubling of events. |
|
Dan Tomlin
4 months ago
Top 16 times are going to be hard to separate in the 60m, last year there were 5 guys at T-16... Will HJ and PV be based on misses if there are ties for #16? |
