Press Release - Vienna City Marathon: Only a Marathon is a Marathon
Press Release - Vienna City Marathon: Only a Marathon is a Marathon

Â
Only a
Â
Is the
“
Â
For years the same accurate and practical
regulations for the course measurement of marathons and road races have
been in place throughout the world. The Association of International
Marathons and Distance Races (AIMS) has been a pioneer in this respect
and created a binding apparatus for such work. It means that it can be
guaranteed that a marathon really is 42,195 metres in length. To be more
exact: it is certain that a marathon is at least 42,195
metres long. This is because one thousandth of the distance is added to
the measured course to ensure that there is no possibility that the
prescribed distance falls short. In the
case of a marathon, that is 42.2 metres.
Â
A
Everyone in
running is aware of this and every serious event organiser keeps to this
rule. ThatÂ’s how comparisons of performances and recognition of records
are possible. This is a very good situation for the millions of runners,
the organisers and the public. A marathon is a marathon, anywhere in the
world. If an organiser departs from these rules, they are beyond the
pale.
Â
But couldnÂ’t it
be just a little shorter?
“Marathons”, “Half Marathons” and other
running competitions are, however, part of triathlon events. These
running distances are not measured according to AIMS criteria. The rules
of the International Triathlon Union (ITU) permit considerable
reductions: “Minor
deviations in the individual disciplines for reasons of local conditions
and/or the difficulty of the course are perfectly acceptable. However,
at championships the deviations are only permitted to account for a
maximum ± 10%, as the German Triathlon Union
states on page 7 of their regulations (2011/13 edition). Reference:
http://www.dtu-info.de/sportordnung.html?file=tl_files/dtu/PDFs/Ordnungen/Sportordnung%202011-3.pdf.
Â
If the 10% rule is applied to a privately licensed IRONMAN
competition, the “Marathon Distance” of 38 kilometres can be “short” and
yet still be considered as conforming to the rules. Which organiser
would not use the ruling to their advantage?
Â
For example, in the competition
arrangements for the Ironman Austria, the length of the running section
is given as 42.195 kilometres. There then follows an addition which
allows room for a great deal of interpretation: the distance should be
understood having “slight variations depending on geographic course length” –
Compare: http://www.triangle.cc/assets/imat_uploads/imat2012_athleten_reglement_en_.doc).
Â
In principle it matters very little what distance a triathlon
includes. If an organiser wants to have the run around a particular
curve of a lake and the running distance only comes to 40 kilometres,
theyÂ’re at liberty to do so. However, as soon as competition distances
such as Marathons or Half Marathons as well as records are up for
discussion, which are precisely regulated in running, the same criteria
must be applied.
Â
Recognition for Sporting Achievements!
In no way should
the sporting achievements of triathlon and Ironman finishers be
belittled and they deserve every respect. The triathletes themselves are
among those who suffer in this situation, since their running times are
not given in the lists for marathon best performances. A “
Â
Â…but under the same Criteria
To present a 38
km run as a course over the marathon distance is a gross deception to
participants and public. Any spectator at a long distance triathlon who
doesnÂ’t know better, thinks that the participants are running the same
distance as at the
Â
To sportsmen and women who contest a
marathon over 42,195 metres and are delighted if they achieve a hard
earned personal best it must seem like a smack in the face to be
compared with triathlon performances where the participants may only
have covered 38 kilometres. Even the specialist media report
enthusiastically about new Ironman World Records such as recently at the
IRONMAN Austria in
Â
IAAF Rules, but correct!
It is also incomprehensible that the
International Triathlon Union ITU refers in its statutes in general to
the guidelines of the world governing body of athletics, the IAAF (See:
http://www.triathlon.org/images/uploads/eom4-appendix-eventsdepartment-20100331b.pdf
- Run course measurement manual (Chapter 9, P. 113) - “This document is based on the
content of the International Association of Athletics Federation (www.iaaf.org) and the Royal Spanish
Federation of Athletics (www.rfea.es) …”), but when it comes to
reality contravenes the regulations for course measurement to a
startling degree.
Â
There are several notable examples of the need for consistency
and accuracy in course measurement in running:
Â
- In 1981 the
American Alberto Salazar achieved a time of
at the New York City Marathon
– a world record at the time which was later annulled because the
course was shown to be 148 metres short which is three-thousandths of
the marathon distance.
Â
- The Kenyan Paul
Tergat ran 58:51 at the 1996 Stramilano Half Marathon in
which appeared to be the first time under 59 minutes. It later emerged that the course was 49 metres short, which meant that the world best was not officially recognised. 49 metres represents something over two-thousandths of a Half Marathon.Milan
Â
- In 2010 the Linz Marathon was correctly measured and then a 201 metre
bend was removed. This led to none of the times subsequently achieved in
that race being recorded in the list of best performances.
Â
- The most recent example for the rightly
high standard set for recognising records came in the 2011 Boston Marathon. Two runners
went under the then valid world record of
which Haile Gebrselassie achieved in
in 2008. Geoffrey Mutai () and Moses Mosop () were not able to celebrate a world record. Apart from the course being the correct length, which was, of course, the case in Boston, the criteria concerning the drop (max. one thousandth of the distance run, therefore 42 metres) and the distance between start and finish, which is permitted to be a maximum 50 per cent of the distance run, which in the case of a marathon is 21.1 kilometres, still had to be observed. The ruling on distance between start and finish is to prevent too much assistance from a tailwind. Both criteria – drop and distance between start and finish – are not met by the Boston Marathon. These criteria are set out in Paragraph 10, Note 28 of the International Competition Rules (IWR) of the World Federation of Athletics, the IAAF.Berlin
Â
This would not have been a problem in
triathlon. A
Â
It should be in
the interest of the IAAF and AIMS that the name “
Â
The first
If athletes like Haile
Gebrselassie, the new
Â
Â
For more information please visit: www.vienna-marathon.com or contact
Â
Â
--
Service by: www.race-news-service.com